Page 1 of 1
Tough Real Test Sc 1
#1
Posted 14 October 2004 - 08:39 AM
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.
a. a greater proportion than it was
b. a greater proportion than
c. a greater proportion than they have been
d. which is greater than was so
e. which is greater that is has been
This appeared in a real GMAT. I will post the OA once i get some explanations.
Thanks
a. a greater proportion than it was
b. a greater proportion than
c. a greater proportion than they have been
d. which is greater than was so
e. which is greater that is has been
This appeared in a real GMAT. I will post the OA once i get some explanations.
Thanks
#4
Posted 14 October 2004 - 01:15 PM
A should be the answer.
We are considering the facts of the past events.
Moreover, accounted is a simple past tense and so it should be simple past tense.
A and D satisfy the rule with "was". D is ruled out bcos of its wrong grammatical structure.
A should be correct.
We are considering the facts of the past events.
Moreover, accounted is a simple past tense and so it should be simple past tense.
A and D satisfy the rule with "was". D is ruled out bcos of its wrong grammatical structure.
A should be correct.
#5
Posted 14 October 2004 - 02:10 PM
IMO
B is correct
A) a greater propotion than it was in any previous election,
soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campagign of 1992
Pronoun- Antacedent error- Wrong
D & E wrong- which
C) use of 'have been' - wrong
B is correct
B is correct
A) a greater propotion than it was in any previous election,
soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campagign of 1992
Pronoun- Antacedent error- Wrong
D & E wrong- which
C) use of 'have been' - wrong
B is correct
#7
Posted 14 October 2004 - 06:10 PM
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campagign of 1992, a greater propotion than it was in any previous election
Problems - 'costs' is plural
Comparison of 'costs' between campaigns of 1992 & previous campaigns, i.e past events.
so between b & c, C has 'they have been'...which past continuous. Not sure if that is ok to use on GMAT answers.
Problems - 'costs' is plural
Comparison of 'costs' between campaigns of 1992 & previous campaigns, i.e past events.
so between b & c, C has 'they have been'...which past continuous. Not sure if that is ok to use on GMAT answers.
#11
Posted 16 October 2004 - 04:27 AM
RockGmat, on Oct 14 2004, 01:39 AM, said:
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.
b. a greater proportion than
b. a greater proportion than
B is best.
I know it's a bit confusing, but the proportion in B is a summative modifier; i.e., it sums up the essence of something said before in the sentence.
Another grammar point the 700 Club needs to know--it must refer to exactly the same noun. If the noun is not exactly the same, it cannot be used.
Compare:
The rock weighed more on Earth than it did on the Moon.
it is okay here because it's the same rock--imagine picking up the rock and carrying it to the new place--same rock, different location, different weight.
This one doesn't work--the means we have one "average American," and this very same average American is the one we're talking about. If this sentence were logically correct, then this average American would have been alive for at least 100 years, and we'd be comparing his weight now with his weight of the past.
Doesn't work.
The average American weighed more last year than 100 years ago.
This works. This construction, lacking the pronoun, allows us to "shift" the reference of the "average American" to the current average American.
Page 1 of 1

Sign In
Register
Help
MultiQuote